10.07.2026
Reading time 3 min

England’s World Cup Travel Distances Exceed Rivals’ by Significant Margin

London to Lisbon and back every game: England rack up the World Cup miles

England’s journey during the World Cup has generated considerable attention, particularly regarding their match against Mexico at the Estadio Azteca. However, a more pressing issue may be the extensive distance the team has traveled, far surpassing that of any other contenders.

The Football Association opted to establish England’s base in Kansas City, despite not having any scheduled games there. Their rationale was to minimize the travel distance for each match by choosing a central location. This decision has resulted in players making round trips of at least 670 miles for each game, calculated simply by measuring the direct distance between their camp and the venues.

With matches in Foxborough, East Rutherford, and Mexico City, each exceeding 1,100 miles one way, England’s players have accumulated an average of approximately 1,842 miles over their first five games. This distance is akin to flying from London to Lisbon and back, a routine journey for footballers engaged in European club competitions. The challenge lies in the fact that England’s average round trip distance is greater than the total mileage covered by France, their rivals, and over 3,000 miles more than their upcoming opponent, Norway.

The shortest return journey completed by Thomas Tuchel’s squad was longer than any of the trips taken by their French counterparts. England has also played all five matches in different locations, with Miami Gardens set to host their sixth match against Norway on Saturday. In contrast, Norway has approached the logistics of their matches by remaining in one location (Greensboro, North Carolina) during the group stage before moving to different cities for their knockout phase encounters.

Some teams have benefited from their strategic decisions regarding base locations, particularly those anticipating a longer tournament run. Belgium’s training camp in Renton, Washington, is conveniently located just around 10 miles from Seattle Stadium, where they played their first two knockout matches. Argentina is also based in Kansas City, where they will play both their opening game and quarter-final. England, expecting to dominate their group, could have planned their travel routes more effectively, perhaps by establishing their camp in Atlanta to stay close to their last-32 match and minimize travel during the group stage.

While this is merely an example, numerous factors influence the choice of a base camp beyond mere distance to matches. Assessing how much of a disadvantage extended travel poses compared to other teams is complex. However, given that England has undertaken three round trips that exceed the total distance traveled by France, this could impact them if they advance far enough to face each other in the final.